Skip to main content Site map
HomeNews and blogs hub

Research Software Maintenance Fund: Update on review process

Bookmark this page Bookmarked

Research Software Maintenance Fund: Update on review process

Author(s)
Selina Aragon

Selina Aragon

Associate Director of Operations

Posted on 18 June 2025

Estimated read time: 2 min
Sections in this article
Share on blog/article:
LinkedIn

Research Software Maintenance Fund: Update on review process

SSI RSMF Logo - Round 1

When we launched the Research Software Maintenance Fund (RSMF) back in April 2025, we anticipated receiving around 200 Expressions of Interest (EoIs), allowing us to invite most applicants to submit a full proposal. Instead, we’ve been delighted to receive 360 EoIs, reflecting a remarkable level of creativity, ambition, and engagement from across the community.

This extraordinary response speaks to the importance and timeliness of the fund, and we are grateful for the time and thought applicants have invested. However, it also means we need to make some changes to how we review EoIs to ensure that the process remains fair, manageable, and consistent for all applicants. 

Updated process 

Each application will be reviewed and assigned to one of three categories based on how well it aligns with the Fund’s eligibility requirements:  

  • Fully in Scope: Applications that clearly align with the aims and eligibility criteria of the grant. These will receive an invitation to submit a full application.
  • Not in Scope: Applications that clearly do not meet the aims or eligibility criteria. These will not be taken forward.
  • Partially in Scope: Applications that don’t clearly demonstrate how they fully fit the core eligibility criteria will be entered into a lottery, with a randomly selected portion invited to submit a full application. 

To help ensure a representative mix of projects, we may split “Partially in Scope” applications into sub-groups by theme or research area before conducting the lottery. This allows us to preserve diversity while maintaining fairness. 

After decisions have been announced, we will publish how the lottery was conducted, how categories were defined, and how sub-groupings were created—so applicants can fully understand the process. Partially in Scope applications which have not been selected during the lottery process will still be allowed to submit an EoI for Round 2.  

Despite this change in process, it’s important to emphasise that we will review all EoIs using the same criteria that were published when the fund opened. Revisit the Eol submission criteria below or on the RSMF webpage

Core Criteria 

Expressions of Interest submissions should demonstrate the following core criteria: 

Software
  • Is the software classified as research software? 

  • Does the proposal clearly identify the software to be maintained? 

Software maturity
  • Has the software clearly had a stable / production release? 
Proposed activities
  • Are the proposed activities focused mainly on maintenance rather than new development? 
UK research benefit
  • Is the software actively used by UK-based researchers who are not part of the development team? 
Lead eligibility
  • Is the lead applicant based at an eligible UK research organisation? 
Team eligibility
  • Are 75% or fewer of the co-leads from non-academic organisations (e.g. business, government, third sector, or international institutions)? 
Team suitability
  • Is the applying team (e.g. lead, co-lead, etc.) part of the original development team or have they made prior contributions to the software? 

Additional Criteria

Clarity of plan
  • Are the objectives clearly specified?  

  • Do the proposed activities align with and support these objectives? 

Award suitability
  • Is the size and duration of the award (large/small) suitable for the proposed activities? 
Impact on UK research
  • Will the outputs of the proposed activities be made available to and benefit UK research? 
Community feedback
  • Have mechanisms for gathering community feedback been described? 

  • Is there a clear plan to incorporate this feedback (i.e. “listening to the community”)? 

Landscape analysis
  • Have the applicants considered other similar software used in this research area? 

  • If few or no other tools are mentioned, is this well justified (e.g. unique features or lack of alternatives)? 

Our commitment to transparency 

We did not anticipate needing to take this approach when the Fund launched, and we apologise for any confusion or disappointment the change in process may cause. However, we remain committed to transparency and treating all our applicants fairly by: 

  • Explaining the review and lottery process in detail;
  • Sharing high-level application statistics and outcomes;
  • Publishing the list of successful projects once funding decisions are finalised;
  • Providing basic feedback. 

What’s next 

All EoI applicants will be notified of their outcome by Monday 7th July 2025. This notification will include: 

  • The category the applicant’s EoI fell into
  • Whether it will progress to the next stage 

Thank you again to everyone who applied. We are grateful not only for your contributions, but also for your understanding as we adjust our approach to manage this first round as fairly and transparently as possible. 

If you have any questions, please contact us at grants@software.ac.uk

 

Back to Top Button Back to top